EO·Atlas
Preview build / EO·Atlas v0.9, content still landing

Terrain elevation addresses the question of how high the ground or ice surface is at a location, to what vertical accuracy, at what grid spacing and relative to which vertical reference. Results are digital elevation models (DEMs). A digital surface model (DSM) represents the top reflective surface including vegetation and buildings, while a digital terrain model (DTM) represents bare ground [1]. Ice-sheet and glacier surface elevation is included; vertical ground motion, the gravity field and ice mass are separate problems.

Copernicus DEM GLO-30 (1 arc second) and GLO-90 (3 arc seconds) are free global DSMs built on TanDEM-X data acquired between about 2011 and 2015, with older DEMs filling gaps [1]. The Copernicus collection description states absolute vertical accuracy below 4 m at 90 percent linear error (LE90) [1]. The German Aerospace Center (DLR) releases a TanDEM-X 90 m DEM for scientific use, a non-edited DSM with possible voids and artefacts [2][3]. DLR states a 12 m product goal of absolute vertical LE90 below 10 m [3] and reports an achieved absolute height error of about 1 m [2]; each figure refers to its own product and definition. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) flew in February 2000 and covers about 80 percent of land [4]. Its 1 arc second product spans 60 degrees north to 56 degrees south and is void-filled from other DEMs [5]. JAXA states that AW3D30, a 1 arc second dataset, is free for commercial and non-commercial use [6].

The Polar Geospatial Center publishes ArcticDEM and the Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica (REMA) as mosaics at 2 m, 10 m and 32 m [7][8]. For REMA, it states absolute uncertainty below 1 m over most of the area [8]. In the United States, the 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) defines airborne lidar quality levels QL0 to QL3 with vertical root mean square errors of 5, 10, 10 and 20 cm [9].

Spaceborne lidar and radar altimetry supply height samples rather than wall-to-wall grids. ICESat-2 ATL06 land-ice height uses 40 m segments spaced 20 m between 88 degrees north and south, with a 91-day repeat [10]. The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) describes centimetre-scale precision on flat ice, degraded by roughness, steep slopes and crevasses [10]. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) records ground elevation per 25 m footprint up to 51.6 degrees latitude [11]. Against airborne lidar over terrain in the Netherlands, Switzerland and New Zealand, one study found root mean square errors of 0.93 m for ICESat-2 and 2.96 m for GEDI [12]. CryoSat-2, carrying a radar altimeter, produced Greenland and Antarctic ice-sheet DEMs and elevation-change maps for 2011 to 2014 [13][14].

Vertical references differ: the DLR 90 m DEM, ICESat-2 ATL06 and ArcticDEM strips use WGS84 ellipsoid heights, while NASADEM, an SRTM reprocessing, converts to a geoid reference, so mixed products need datum reconciliation [3][10][7][15]. Acquisition epoch matters on surfaces that have since changed: Copernicus DEM reflects 2011 to 2015 and SRTM a February 2000 snapshot [1][4].

What's available today

1 service and 17 sensors. Start with the most-used; switch to Filter for the full catalogue.

Sources
How to cite this page

Plain text

Terrain elevation. EO-Atlas, SpectraWorks B.V., last reviewed 2026-10-21. https://eo-atlas.org/topics/terrain-elevation (CC BY 4.0)

BibTeX

@misc{eoatlas:topics:terrain-elevation,
  title = {Terrain elevation},
  author = {{EO-Atlas}},
  publisher = {SpectraWorks B.V.},
  year = {2026},
  note = {Last reviewed 2026-10-21. CC BY 4.0},
  url = {https://eo-atlas.org/topics/terrain-elevation}
}